Paper detail

Mechanistic Learning for Survival Prediction in NSCLC Using Routine Blood Biomarkers and Tumor Kinetics

Background Predicting overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is essential for clinical decision-making and drug development. While tumor and blood test markers kinetics are intrinsically linked, their joint dynamics and relationship to OS remain unknown. Methods We developed a mechanistic model capturing the interplay between tumor (T) burden and three key blood markers kinetics: albumin (A), lactate dehydrogenase (L), and neutrophils (N), through coupled differential equations (termed TALN-k). This model was enhanced with a machine learning framework (TALN-kML) for OS prediction. The model was trained and validated on clinical trial data from NSCLC patients treated with atezolizumab in monotherapy (N = 862 patients) or combination therapy (N = 1,115). Model parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling, and survival predictions were assessed using individual and trial level metrics. Results TALN-k successfully described individual and population-level marker kinetics, revealing complex interactions between tumor and blood markers, and improving corrected BIC and log-likelihood metrics by a significant margin of previous empirical state-of-the-art models. Feature selection methods also highlighted valuable predictive parameters, indicatives of good or poor prognosis. The TALN-kML model outperformed empirical, uncoupled models, achieving improved C-index (0.74 $\pm$ 0.02 vs 0.72 $\pm$ 0.03), 12-months AUC (0.83 $\pm$ 0.004 vs 0.79 $\pm$ 0.05), and accuracy (0.77 $\pm$ 0.03 vs 0.76 $\pm$ 0.05) in OS prediction. Conclusion Our mechanistic learning approach allows for an interpretable model, which improves on longitudinal data description and on survival prediction in NSCLC by jointly integrating tumor and blood markers kinetics. This methodology offers a promising avenue for both personalized treatment strategies and drug development optimization.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.