Paper detail

Mechanisms of the reaction pi^-p --> a^0_0(980)n --> p-^0 eta n at high energies

The main dynamical mechanisms of the reaction $π^-p \rightarrow a^0_0 (980)n \rightarrow π^0ηn$ at high energies, currently investigated at Serpukhov and Brookhaven, are considered in detail. It is shown that the observed forward peak in its differential cross section can be explained within the framework of the Regge pole model only by the conspiring $ρ_2$ Regge pole exchange. The tentative estimates of the absolute $π^-p \rightarrow a^0_0(980)n \rightarrow π^0ηn$ reaction cross section at $P_{lab}^{π^-} = 18$ GeV/c are obtained: $σ\approx200$ nb and, in the forward direction, $dσ/dt\approx940$ nb/GeV$^2$. The contribution of the one pion exchange, which is forbidden by $G$-parity and which can rise owing to the $f^0_0(980)-a^0_0(980)$ mixing, is also estimate. A role of the Regge cuts in the non-flip helicity amplitude is briefly examined and a conclusion is made that the contributions of the cuts have to be inessential in comparison with the conspiring $ρ_2$ Regge pole exchange.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.