Paper detail

Mechanisms of Baryon Loss for Dark Satellites in Cosmological SPH Simulations

We present a study of satellites in orbit around a high-resolution, smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) galaxy simulated in a cosmological context. The simulated galaxy is approximately the same mass as the Milky Way. The cumulative number of luminous satellites at z = 0 is similar to the observed system of satellites orbiting the Milky Way although an analysis of the satellite mass function reveals an order of magnitude more dark satellites than luminous. Some of the dark subhalos are more massive than some of the luminous subhalos at z = 0. What separates luminous and dark subhalos is not their mass at z = 0, but the maximum mass the subhalos ever achieve. We study the effect of four mass loss mechanisms on the subhalos: ultraviolet (UV) ionising radiation, ram pressure stripping, tidal stripping, and stellar feedback, and compare the impact of each of these four mechanisms on the satellites. In the lowest mass subhalos, UV is responsible for the majority of the baryonic mass loss. Ram pressure stripping removes whatever mass remains from the low mass satellites. More massive subhalos have deeper potential wells and retain more mass during reionisation. However, as satellites pass near the centre of the main halo, tidal forces cause significant mass loss from satellites of all masses. Satellites that are tidally stripped from the outside can account for the luminous satellites that are lower mass than some of the dark satellites. Stellar feedback has the greatest impact on medium mass satellites that had formed stars, but lost all their gas by z = 0. Our results demonstrate that the missing satellite problem is not an intractable issue with the cold dark matter cosmology, but is rather a manifestation of baryonic processes.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.