Paper detail

Mechanisms for the clustering of inertial particles in the inertial range of isotropic turbulence

In this paper, we consider the physical mechanism for the clustering of inertial particles in the inertial range of isotropic turbulence. We analyze the exact, but unclosed, equation governing the radial distribution function (RDF) and compare the mechanisms it describes for clustering in the dissipation and inertial ranges. We demonstrate that in the limit ${St_r\ll1}$, where $St_r$ is the Stokes number based on the eddy turnover timescale at separation $r$, the clustering in the inertial range can be understood to be due to the preferential sampling of the coarse-grained fluid velocity gradient tensor at that scale. When ${St_r\gtrsim\mathcal{O}(1)}$ this mechanism gives way to a non-local clustering mechanism. These findings reveal that the clustering mechanisms in the inertial range are analogous to the mechanisms that we identified for the dissipation regime (see \emph{New J. Phys.} \textbf{16}:055013, 2014). Further, we discuss the similarities and differences between the clustering mechanisms we identify in the inertial range and the "sweep-stick" mechanism developed by Coleman \& Vassilicos (Phys. Fluids 21:113301, 2009). We argue that when ${St_r\ll1}$ the sweep-stick mechanism is equivalent to our mechanism in the inertial range if the particles are suspended in Navier-Stokes turbulence, but that the sweep-stick mechanism breaks down for ${St_r\gtrsim\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The argument also explains why the sweep-stick mechanism is unable to predict particle clustering in kinematic simulations. We then consider the closed, model equation for the RDF given in Zaichik \& Alipchenkov (Phys. Fluids. 19:113308, 2007) and use this, together with the results from our analysis, to predict the analytic form of the RDF in the inertial range for ${St_r\ll1}$, which, unlike that in the dissipation range, is not scale-invariant. The results are in good agreement with direct...

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.