Paper detail

Mechanical Properties of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-d Fuel Cell Electrodes

LSCF is a promising candidate for the cathode in SOFCs. Understanding the microstructural characteristics is crucial to its application because they predominately determine the performance and durability of the porous cathodes and hence of the SOFCs. To date little work has been reported on its mechanical properties and their correlation with the 3D microstructures. The main purpose of this research was to study the mechanical properties of both films and bulk samples, and to evaluate the effect of microstructural parameters, by means of both experimental and numerical methods. Room-temperature mechanical properties were investigated by nanoindentation. The elastic modulus of the bulk samples was found to increase from 33.8 to 174.3 GPa and hardness from 0.64 to 5.32 GPa as the porosity decreased from 0.45 to 0.05 after sintering at 900 to 1200C. It was shown that reliable measurements of the true properties of the films were obtained provided that the effects from both surface roughness and substrate were minimised to neglected levels within a certain range of indentation depth to film thickness ratio. The fracture toughnesses of bulk LSCF were determined to increase from 0.51 to 0.99 MPam0.5. The microstructures of films were characterised using FIB-SEM slice and view technique and the actual 3D microstructure models of the porous films were reconstructed based on the tomographic data obtained. Finite element modelling of the elastic modulus agreed well with the nanoindentation results. The 3D microstructures were numerically modified at constant porosity using cellular automaton method, so that the influence on elastic modulus of factors other than porosity could be evaluated. It was found that the heterogeneity of the pore structure has a significant influence on the elastic properties computed using mechanical simulation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.