Paper detail

Mechanical classification of voice quality

While there is no a priori definition of good singing voices, we tend to make consistent evaluations of the quality of singing almost instantaneously. Such an instantaneous evaluation might be based on the sound spectrum that can be perceived in a short time. Here we devise a Bayesian algorithm that learns to evaluate the choral proficiency, musical scale, and gender of individual singers using the sound spectra of singing voices. In particular, the classification is performed on a set of sound spectral intensities, whose frequencies are selected by minimizing the Bayes risk. This optimization allows the algorithm to capture sound frequencies that are essential for each discrimination task, resulting in a good assessment performance. Experimental results revealed that a sound duration of about 0.1 sec is sufficient for determining the choral proficiency and gender of a singer. With a program constructed on this algorithm, everyone can evaluate choral voices of others and perform private vocal exercises.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.