Paper detail

Measuring Tree Balance with Normalized Tree Area

The study of species organization and their clustering by genetic or phenotypic similarity is carried out with the tools of phylogenetic trees. An important structural property of phylogenetic trees is the balance, which measures how taxa are distributed among clades. Tree balance can be measured using indices such as the Sackin ($S$) and the Total Cophenetic ($Φ$), which are based on the distance between nodes of the tree and its root. Here, we propose a new metric for tree balance, $\bar{d}$, the Area per Pair (APP) of the tree, which is a re-scaled version of the so called tree area. We compute $\bar{d}$ for the rooted caterpillar and maximally balanced trees and we also obtain exact formulas for its expected value and variance under the Yule model. The variance of APP for Yule trees has the remarkable property of converging to an asymptotic constant value for large trees. We compare the Sackin, Total Cophenetic and APP indices for hundreds of empirical phylogenies and show that APP represents the observed distribution of tree balances better than the two other metrics.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.