Paper detail

Measuring the Gluon Density in e + A Collisions: KLN CGC, DGLAP Glauber, or Neither?

We predict readily experimentally measurable differences in the diffractive cross section in the coherent exclusive photoproduction of J/psi mesons in e + A collisions at eRHIC and LHeC energies for nuclear gluon distributions assumed to 1) evolve in x with DGLAP dynamics and have a spatial distribution proportional to the Glauber nuclear thickness function and 2) evolve in x and b according to the KLN prescription of CGC dynamics. We find that CGC physics predicts that the nuclear gluon density widens significantly as a function of x yielding diffractive peaks and minima that evolve dramatically with x; on the other hand the DGLAP Glauber distribution yields peaks and minima constant in x. We also find that the dipole cross section at the level of two gluon exchange within the KLN parameterization of the CGC satisfies the black disk limit whereas this limit is violated when DGLAP evolution is used; the normalization of the diffractive cross section grows more slowly in x by several orders of magnitude when using the KLN parameterization as compared to the result when employing DGLAP evolution.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.