Paper detail

Measuring the Etalon Quality of the GREGOR Fabry-Pérot Interferometer

Imaging spectropolarimetry is an important observational tool in solar physics because of fast-cadence spectral scans with high-spectral resolution, large field-of-view, and its inherent suitability for post-facto image restoration. Fabry-Pérot etalons are the key optical elements of these instruments. Their optical quality critically defines the instrument's performance. The two etalons of the GREGOR Fabry-Pérot Interferometer (GFPI) were used for more than 10~years, raising questions about the potential deterioration of etalons coatings. We present an assessment of the etalons optical quality, describe the inspection method based on Zernike polynomials, discuss the field dependence of the finesse and its consequences for instrument design, and investigate the impact of the measurement technique to achieve plate parallelism. We find that extended exposure to sunlight affects the etalon coatings, i.e., lowering the peak transmission and leaving an imprint of the pupil of the GREGOR solar telescope on the etalon that is directly exposed to sunlight. The finesse of both etalons, however, remains high so that the impact on imaging spectropolarimetry is negligible.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.