Paper detail

Measuring the escape velocity and mass profiles of galaxy clusters beyond their virial radius

The caustic technique uses galaxy redshifts alone to measure the escape velocity and mass profiles of galaxy clusters to clustrocentric distances well beyond the virial radius, where dynamical equilibrium does not necessarily hold. We provide a detailed description of this technique and analyse its possible systematic errors. We apply the caustic technique to clusters with mass M_200>=10^{14}h^{-1} M_sun extracted from a cosmological hydrodynamic simulation of a LambdaCDM universe. With a few tens of redshifts per squared comoving megaparsec within the cluster, the caustic technique, on average, recovers the profile of the escape velocity from the cluster with better than 10 percent accuracy up to r~4 r_200. The caustic technique also recovers the mass profile with better than 10 percent accuracy in the range (0.6-4) r_200, but it overestimates the mass up to 70 percent at smaller radii. This overestimate is a consequence of neglecting the radial dependence of the filling function F_beta(r). The 1-sigma uncertainty on individual escape velocity profiles increases from ~20 to ~50 percent when the radius increases from r~0.1 r_200 to ~4 r_200. Individual mass profiles have 1-sigma uncertainty between 40 and 80 percent within the radial range (0.6-4) r_200. We show that the amplitude of these uncertainties is completely due to the assumption of spherical symmetry, which is difficult to drop. Alternatively, we can apply the technique to synthetic clusters obtained by stacking individual clusters: in this case, the 1-sigma uncertainty on the escape velocity profile is smaller than 20 percent out to 4 r_200. The caustic technique thus provides reliable average profiles which extend to regions difficult or impossible to probe with other techniques.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.