Paper detail

Measuring the black hole masses in accreting X-ray binaries by detecting the Doppler orbital motion of their accretion disk wind absorption lines

So far essentially all black hole masses in X-ray binaries have been obtained by observing the companion star's velocity and light curves as functions of the orbital phase. However a major uncertainty is the estimate of the orbital inclination angle of an X-ray binary. Here we suggest to measure the black hole mass in an X-ray binary by measuring directly the black hole's orbital motion, thus obtaining the companion to black hole mass ratio. In this method we assume that accretion disk wind moves with the black hole and thus the black hole's orbital motion can be obtained from the Doppler velocity of the absorption lines produced in the accretion disk wind. We validate this method by analyzing the Chandra/HETG observations of GRO J1655-40, in which the black hole orbital motion with line of sight velocity of 90.8 (+-11.3) km/s, inferred from the Doppler velocity of disk-wind absorption lines, is consistent with the prediction from its previously measured system parameters. We obtain the black hole mass of 5.41 (+0.98, -0.57) solar masses and system inclination of 72.0 (+7.8, -7.5) degrees in GRO J1655-40. Additional observations of this source covering more orbital phases can improve estimates on its system parameters substantially. We then apply the method to the black hole X-ray binary LMC X-3 observed with HST/COS near orbital phase 0.75. We find that the disk-wind absorption lines of CIV doublet were shifted to about 50 km/s, which yields a companion-to-black-hole mass ratio of 0.6 for an assumed disk wind velocity of -400 km/s. Additional observations covering other orbital phases (0.25 in particular) are crucial to ease this assumption and then to directly constrain the mass ratio. This method in principle can also be applied to any accreting compact objects with detectable accretion disk wind absorption line features.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.