Paper detail

Measuring the Accuracy of Linked Data Indices

Being based on Web technologies, Linked Data is distributed and decentralised in its nature. Hence, for the purpose of finding relevant Linked Data on the Web, search indices play an important role. Also for avoiding network communication overhead and latency, applications rely on indices or caches over Linked Data. These indices and caches are based on local copies of the original data and, thereby, introduce redundancy. Furthermore, as changes at the original Linked Data sources are not automatically propagated to the local copies, there is a risk of having inaccurate indices and caches due to outdated information. In this paper I discuss and compare methods for measuring the accuracy of indices. I will present different measures which have been used in related work and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages from a theoretic point of view as well as from a practical point of view by analysing their behaviour on real world data in an empirical experiment.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.