Paper detail

Measuring Responsiveness in the Online Public Sphere for the 2016 U.S. Election: Concepts

The election narrative is formed under the competitions of ideas among critical players involving politicians, news media, public influentials, and the general public. Untangling the complex process of narrative formation, however, is no easy task due to implicit influences among the key players. This paper outlines a conceptual framework to untangle this complex process. We propose the problem of measuring "responsiveness" that quantifies a player's influence on another given a specific election topic over time. In particular, we make use of multivariate Hawkes Process to infer the influence network between pairs of election players. We demonstrate an early version system of analytic pipeline of online public sphere discussions from data ingestion, influence inference, to visualization. The paper concludes by showcasing some preliminary results based on Twitter and news media election-related contents from July to October 2015 and discussing plans for future research.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.