Paper detail

Measuring Cold Dark Matter Power Spectrum from Variations of Hubble Flows

When Cold Dark Matter (CDM) power spectrum normalized by COBE results, its amplitude at smaller scales can be parametrized by $Γ\simΩ_0h$. The expected variations of Hubble flows in two samples, the sample of 36 clusters in the Mark III catalogue, and the sample of 20 Type Ia supernovae (SNe), are calculated for the power spectrum in critical-density CDM models (including tilted CDM models and vacuum-dominated CDM models). The comparison between the expectations and the real variations in the data offers a bias-free way to constrain the power spectrum. The cluster sample yields $Γ\le 0.30-0.88(n_{ps}-1)+1.9 (n_{ps}-1)^2$ at 95% C.L., with best fits $Γ= 0.15-0.39(n_{ps}-1)+0.37(n_{ps}-1)^2$, where $n_{ps}$ is the spectral index of the power spectrum. The Type Ia SN sample yields $Γ\le 0.25-0.80(n_{ps}-1)+1.6 (n_{ps}-1)^2$ at 95% C.L., strongly favoring lower $Γ$'s. The results are inconsistent with a critical-density matter-dominated universe with $n_{ps}\ga 0.8$ and $H_0\ga 50$ km/sec/Mpc.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.