Paper detail

Measuring BAO and non-Gaussianity via QSO clustering

Our goals are (i) to search for BAO and large-scale structure in current QSO survey data and (ii) to use these and simulation/forecast results to assess the science case for a new, >10x larger, QSO survey. We first combine the SDSS, 2QZ and 2SLAQ surveys to form a survey of ~60000 QSOs. We find a hint of a peak in the QSO 2-point correlation function, xi(s), at the same scale (~105h^-1 Mpc) as detected by Eisenstein et al (2005) in their sample of DR5 LRGs but only at low statistical significance. We then compare these data with QSO mock catalogues from the Hubble Volume simulation used by Hoyle et al (2002) and find that both routes give statistical error estimates that are consistent at ~100h^-1 Mpc scales. Mock catalogues are then used to estimate the nominal survey size needed for a 3-4 sigma detection of the BAO peak. We find that a redshift survey of ~250000 z<2.2 QSOs is required over ~3000 deg^2. This is further confirmed by static log-normal simulations where the BAO are clearly detectable in the QSO power spectrum and correlation function. The nominal survey would on its own produce the first detection of, for example, discontinuous dark energy evolution in the so far uncharted 1<z<2.2 redshift range. A survey with ~50% higher QSO sky densities and 50% bigger area will give an ~6sigma BAO detection, leading to an error ~60% of the size of the BOSS error on the dark energy evolution parameter, w_a. Another important aim for a QSO survey is to place new limits on primordial non-Gaussianity at large scales, testing tentative evidence we have found for the evolution of the linear form of the combined QSO xi(s) at z~1.6. Such a QSO survey will also determine the gravitational growth rate at z~1.6 via z-space distortions, allow lensing tomography via QSO magnification bias while also measuring the exact luminosity dependence of small-scale QSO clustering.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.