Paper detail

Measuring and simulating the biophysical basis of the acoustic contrast factor of biological cells

The acoustic contrast factor (ACF) is calculated from the relative density and compressibility differences between a fluid and an object in the fluid. To name but one application, this acoustic contrast can be exploited using acoustophoretic systems to isolate cancer cells from a liquid biopsy, such as a blood sample. Knowing the ACF of a cancer cell represents a crucial step in the design of acoustophoretic systems for this purpose, potentially allowing the isolation of circulating cancer cells without labels or contact. For biological cells the static compressibility is different from the high frequency counterpart relevant for the ACF. In this study, we started by characterizing the ACF of low vs. high metastatic cell lines with known associated differences in phenotypic static E-modulus. The change in the static E-modulus, however, was not reflected in a change of the ACF, prompting a more in depth analysis of the influences on the ACF. We demonstrate that static E-modulus increased biological cells through formaldehyde fixation have an increased ACF. Conversely static E-modulus decreased biological cells treated with actin polymerization inhibitor cytochalasin D have a decreased ACF. Complementing these mechanical tests, a numerical COMSOL model was implemented and used to parametrically explore the effects of cell density, cell density ratios, dynamic compressibility and therefore the dynamic bulk modulus. Collectively the combined laboratory and numerical experiments reveal that a change in the static E-modulus alone might, but does not automatically lead to a change of the dynamic ACF for biological cells. This highlights the need for a multiparametic view of the biophysical basis of the cellular ACF, as well as the challenges in harnessing acoustophoretic systems to isolate circulating cells based on their mechanical properties alone.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.