Paper detail

Measuring and Characterizing International Collaboration Patterns in Indian Scientific Research

Scientific collaboration at international level has increased manifolds during last two decades. Collaboration is not only associated with higher research productivity but has also been found to be positively correlated with impact. Considering the benefits and advantages of international collaboration for the national science and technology systems of a country, policymakers in different countries have designed programs to promote international collaboration in science. This paper attempts to measure and characterize the international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research. Research publication data for the last 20 years (2001-2020), obtained from Web of Science, is analysed for the purpose. Analytical results show that India's international collaboration has grown at a rate of 12.27% during this period, rising from only 20.73% internationally collaborated papers in 2001 to 32.35% internationally collaborated papers in 2020. USA, Germany, England, South Korea and China are found to be the top collaborating partners for India during his period, however, some subject area-wise variations are also seen. Among the internationally collaborated papers, about 50% papers have an Indian researcher as lead (first) author, and more than 50% authors of such internationally collaborated papers are from India. The internationally collaborated papers from India are also found to have a slight advantage in terms of citation impact and social media visibility. The probable factors shaping the Indian international collaboration and the major policy implications are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.