Paper detail

Measures for a Multidimensional Multiverse

We explore the phenomenological implications of generalizing measures to a multidimensional multiverse. We consider a simple model in which the vacua are nucleated from a $D$-dimensional parent spacetime through dynamical compactification of the extra dimensions, and compute the geometric contribution to the probability distribution of observations within the multiverse for each measure. We then study how the shape of this probability distribution depends on the timescales for the existence of observers, for vacuum domination, and for curvature domination ($t_{obs}, t_Λ,$ and $t_c$, respectively.) In this work we restrict ourselves to bubbles with positive cosmological constant, $Λ$. In the case of the causal patch cutoff, when the bubble universes have $p+1$ large spatial dimensions with $p \geq 2$, the shape of the probability distribution is such that we obtain the coincidence of timescales $t_{obs} \sim t_Λ \sim t_c$. Moreover, the size of the cosmological constant is related to the size of the landscape. However, the exact shape of the probability distribution is different in the case $p = 2$, compared to $p \geq 3$. In the case of the fat geodesic measure, the result is even more robust: the shape of the probability distribution is the same for all $p \geq 2$, and we once again obtain the coincidence $t_{obs} \sim t_Λ \sim t_c$. These results require only very mild conditions on the prior probability of the distribution of vacua in the landscape. Our work shows that the observed double coincidence of timescales is a robust prediction even when the multiverse is generalized to be multidimensional; that this coincidence is not a consequence of our particular universe being (3+1)-dimensional; and that this observable cannot be used to preferentially select one measure over another in a multidimensional multiverse.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.