Paper detail

Measurements of the Decay KL->e+e-mu+mu-

The KTeV experiment at Fermilab has isolated a total of 132 events from the rare decay KL->e+e-mu+mu-, with an estimated background of 0.8 events. The branching ratio of this mode is determined to be 2.69 +/- 0.24 (stat) +/- 0.12 (syst) x 10^-9, with a radiative cutoff of M(eemm)^2/M(K)^2 > 0.95. The first measurement using this mode of the parameter alpha from the D'Ambrosio, Isidori, and Portoles model of the KLg*g* vertex yields a result of -1.59 +/- 0.37, consistent with values obtained from other decay modes. Because of the limited statistics, no sensitivity is found to the DIP parameter beta. The magnitude of the angular distribution asymmetry between the e+e- and mu+mu- planes, indicative of a CP-violating contribution to the decay, is found to be consistent with zero. We set a 90% C.L. upper limit of 4.12 x 10^(-11) on the branching ratio of the lepton flavor--violating mode KL->e+-e+-mu+-mu+-, a factor of three improvement over the current limit from the KTeV experiment.

preprint2002arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.