Paper detail

Measurements of Anisotropic Ion Temperatures, Non-Thermal Velocities, and Doppler Shifts in a Coronal Hole

We present a new diagnostic allowing one to measure the anisotropy of ion temperatures and non-thermal velocities as well as Doppler shifts with respect to the ambient magnetic field. This method provides new results, as well as independent test for previous measurements obtained with other techniques. Our spectral data come from observations of a low latitude, on-disk coronal hole. A potential field source surface model was used to calculate the angle between the magnetic field lines and the line of sight for each spatial bin of the observation. A fit was performed to determine the line widths and Doppler shifts parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field. For each line width component we derived parallel and perpendicular ion temperatures and non-thermal velocities. The perpendicular ion temperature was cooler than off-limb polar coronal hole measurements. The parallel ion temperature was consistent with a uniform temperature of 1.8 +/- 0.2 x 10^{6} K for each ion. Since parallel ion heating is expected to be weak, this ion temperature should reflect the proton temperature. A comparison between our results and others implies a large proton temperature gradient around 1.02 R_sun. The non-thermal velocities are thought to be proportional to the amplitudes of various waves. Our results for the perpendicular non-thermal velocity agree with Alfvén wave amplitudes inferred from off-limb polar coronal hole line width measurements. Our parallel non-thermal velocity results are consistent with slow magnetosonic wave amplitudes inferred from Fourier analysis of time varying intensity fluctuations. Doppler shift measurements yield outflows of ~5 km s^-1 for ions formed over a broad temperature range. This differs from other studies which found a strong Doppler shift dependence on formation temperature.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.