Paper detail

Measurement partitioning and observational equivalence in state estimation

This letter studies measurement partitioning and equivalence in state estimation based on graph-theoretic principles. We show that a set of critical measurements (required to ensure LTI state-space observability) can be further partitioned into two types:~$α$ and~$β$. This partitioning is driven by different graphical (or algebraic) methods used to define the corresponding measurements. Subsequently, we describe observational equivalence, i.e. given an~$α$ (or~$β$) measurement, say~$y_i$, what is the set of measurements equivalent to~$y_i$, such that only one measurement in this set is required to ensure observability? Since~$α$ and~$β$ measurements are cast using different algebraic and graphical characteristics, their equivalence sets are also derived using different algebraic and graph-theoretic principles. We illustrate the related concepts on an appropriate system digraph.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.