Paper detail

Measurement of the form factors of the decay B^+\to\bar D^{*0}\ell^+ν_\ell and determination of the CKM matrix element |V_{cb}|

We present a measurement of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element $|V_{cb}|$ times the form factor normalization $\mathcal{F}(1)$ using the decay $B^+\to\bar D^{*0}\ell^+ν_\ell$. This measurement is performed together with a determination of the form factor parameters $ρ^2$, $R_1(1)$ and $R_2(1)$ which fully characterize this decay in the framework of Heavy Quark Effective Theory. This analysis is based on a data sample equivalent to 140 fb$^{-1}$ of Belle data collected near the $Υ(4S)$ resonance. The preliminary results, based on about 27,000 reconstructed $B^+\to\bar D^{*0}\ell^+ν_\ell$ decays, are $ρ^2=1.376\pm 0.074\pm 0.056$, $R_1(1)=1.620\pm 0.091\pm 0.092$, $R_2(1)=0.805\pm 0.064\pm 0.036$ and $\mathcal{F}(1)|V_{cb}|=35.0\pm 0.4\pm 2.2$. We find the $B^+\to\bar D^{*0}\ell^+ν_\ell$ branching fraction to be $(4.84\pm 0.04\pm 0.56)%$. For all numbers quoted here, the first error is the statistical and the second is the systematic uncertainty. A direct, model-independent determination of the form factor shapes has also been carried out and shows good agreement with the HQET based form factor parametrization by Caprini {\it et al.}.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.