Paper detail

Measurement of the Energy Gap of Au55 Nanoparticles Using Far-infrared Transmission Spectroscopy

We have carried out far-infrared (far-IR) transmission measurements on the ligand stabilized Au55 nanoparticles dispersed in Teflon at volume fractions ranging from 0.2% to 1%. Instead of a series of peaks which might arise from the electron transition between discrete energy levels, we have observed a broad far-IR absorption coefficient that follows with an onset at Δ ~ 10 cm-1. Furthermore this frequency dependence is totally different from that of the expected absorption due to the induced electric dipole. The onset of the absorption reminiscent of an energy gap at ~ 10 cm-1 (~ 1. 2 meV) is surprisingly smaller than that of the expected for a metal sphere of 5.3 Å in radius and independent of temperature. In this work we did not observe the level correlation effect on the far-IR absorption predicted for an ensemble of metal nanoparticles. It is concluded that Au55 nanoparticles behave like a three-dimensional (3D) semimetal with an energy gap Δ ~ 10 cm-1 rather than a giant atom.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.