Paper detail

Measurement of the $D^0 \to π^- e^+ ν_e$ differential decay branching fraction as a function of $q^2$ and study of form factor parameterizations

Based on a sample of 500 million $e^+e^- \to c\bar c$ events recorded by the BaBar detector at c.m. energies of close to 10.6 GeV, we report on a study of the decay $D^0 \to π^- e^+ ν_e$. We measure the ratio of branching fractions $R_D = {\cal B}(D^0 \to π^- e^+ ν_e)/{\cal B}(D^0 \to K^- π^+) = 0.0713 \pm 0.0017_{stat.} \pm 0.0024_{syst.}$, and use the present world average for ${\cal B}(D^0 \to K^- π^+)$ to obtain ${\cal B}(D^0 \to π^- e^+ ν_e) = (2.770 \pm 0.068_{\rm stat.} \pm 0.092_{\rm syst.} \pm 0.037_{\rm ext.})\times 10^{-3}$ where the third error accounts for the uncertainty on the branching fraction for the reference channel. The measured dependence of the differential branching fraction on $q^2$, the four-momentum transfer squared between the $D$ and the $π$ meson, is compared to various theoretical predictions for the hadronic form factor, $f_{+,D}^π(q^2)$, and the normalization $|V_{cd}| \times f_{+,D}^π(q^2=0)=0.1374\pm0.0038_{\rm stat.} \pm0.0022_{\rm syst.} \pm0.0009_{\rm ext.}$ is extracted from a fit to data. Using the most recent LQCD prediction of $f_{+,D}^π(q^2=0)=0.666 \pm 0.029$, we obtain $|V_{cd}|=0.206 \pm 0.007_{\rm exp.} \pm 0.009_{\rm LQCD}$. Assuming instead, $|V_{cd}|=|V_{us}|=0.2252 \pm 0.0009$, we obtain $f_{+,D}^π(q^2=0)=0.610 \pm 0.020_{\rm exp.} \pm 0.005_{\rm ext.}$. The $q^2$ dependence of $f_{+,D}^π(q^2)$ is compared to a variety of multi-pole parameterizations. This information is applied to $B^0 \to π^- e^+ ν_e$ decays and, combined with an earlier $B^0 \to π^- e^+ ν_e$ measurement by BaBar, is used to derive estimates of $|V_{ub}|$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.