Paper detail

Measurement of the CP-Violating Asymmetries in B0 -> KS pi0 and of the Branching Fraction of B0 -> K0 pi0

We present a measurement of the time-dependent CP-violating asymmetries in $B^0 \to K^0_{\scriptscriptstyle S}π^0$ decays based on 383 million $Υ(4S)\to B\kern 0.18em\bar{\kern -0.18em B}$ events collected by the \mbox{\slshape B\kern-0.1em{\smaller A}\kern-0.1em B\kern-0.1em{\smaller A\kern-0.2em R}} experiment at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy $B$ Factory at SLAC. We measure the direct CP-violating asymmetry $C_{K^0_{\scriptscriptstyle S}π^0} = 0.24 \pm 0.15 \pm 0.03$ and the CP-violating asymmetry in the interference between mixing and decay $S_{K^0_{\scriptscriptstyle S}π^0} = 0.40 \pm 0.23 \pm 0.03$, where the first errors are statistical and the second are systematic. On the same sample, we measure the decay branching fraction, obtaining ${\cal B}(B^0 \to K^0π^0)= (10.3 \pm 0.7 \pm 0.6)\times 10^{-6}$.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.