Paper detail

Measurement of the Branching Fractions of the Radiative Charm Decays $D^{0} \to {\bar K}^{*0} γ$ and $D^{0} \to ϕγ$

We present a measurement of the branching fractions for the Cabibbo-favored radiative decay, $D^{0} \to {\bar K}^{*0} γ$, and the Cabibbo-suppressed radiative decay, $D^{0} \to ϕγ$. These measurements are based on a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $387.1 fb^{-1}$, recorded with the BaBar detector at the PEP-II $e^+e^-$ asymmetric-energy collider operating at center-of-mass energies 10.58 and 10.54 GeV. We measure the branching fractions relative to the well-studied decay $D^{0} \to K^{-} π^{+}$ and find ${\cal B}(D^{0} \to {\bar K}^{*0} γ)/{\cal B}(D^{0} \to K^{-} π^{+}) = (8.43 \pm 0.51 \pm 0.70) \times 10^{-3}$ and ${\cal B}(D^{0} \to ϕγ)/{\cal B}(D^{0} \to K^{-} π^{+}) = (7.15 \pm 0.78 \pm 0.69) \times 10^{-4}$, where the first error is statistical and the second is systematic. This is the first measurement of ${\cal B}(D^{0} \to {\bar K}^{*0} γ)$.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.