Paper detail

Measurement of returns to scale with weight restrictions: How to deal with the occurrence of multiple supporting hyperplanes?

While measuring returns to scale in data envelopment analysis (DEA), the occurrence of multiple supporting hyperplanes has been perceived as a crucial issue. To deal effectively with this in weigh restrictions (WR) framework, we first precisely identify the two potential sources of its origin in the non-radial DEA setting. If the firm under evaluation P is WR-efficient, the non-full-dimensionality of its corresponding P-face-a face of minimum dimension that contains P-is the unique source of origin (problem Type I). Otherwise, the occurrence of multiple WR-projections or, correspondingly, multiple P-faces becomes the other additional source of origin (problem Type II). To the best of our knowledge, while problem Type I has been correctly addressed in the literature, the simultaneous occurrences of problems Types I and II have not effectively been coped with. Motivated by this, we first show that problem Type II can be circumvented by using a P-face containing all the P-faces. Based on this finding, we then devise a two-stage linear programming based procedure by extending a recently developed methodology by [Mehdiloozad, M., Mirdehghan, S. M., Sahoo, B. K., & Roshdi, I. (2015). On the identification of the global reference set in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 245, 779-788]. Our proposed method inherits all the advantages of the recently developed method and is computationally efficient. The practical applicability of our proposed method is demonstrated through a real-world data set of 80 Iranian secondary schools.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.