Paper detail

Measurement of CP violation observables and parameters for the decays $B^{\pm}\to D K^{*\pm}$

We study the decay $B^-\to DK^{*-}$ using a sample of 379$\times 10^6$ $Υ(4S)\to B\bar{B}$ events collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II $B$-factory. We perform a "GLW" analysis where the $D$ meson decays into either a CP-even ($CP+$) eigenstate ($K^+K^-$, $π^+π^-$), CP-odd ($CP-$) eigenstate ($K^0_Sπ^0$, $K^0_Sϕ$, $K^0_Sω$) or a non-CP state ($K^-π^+$). We also analyze $D$ meson decays into $K^+π^-$ from a Cabibbo-favored $\bar{D}^0$ decay or doubly suppressed $D^0$ decay ("ADS" analysis). We measure observables that are sensitive to the CKM angle $γ$: the partial-rate charge asymmetries ${\cal A}_{CP\pm}$, the ratios ${\cal R}_{CP\pm}$ of the B-decay branching fractions in $CP\pm$ and non-CP decay, the ratio ${\cal R}_{ADS}$ of the charge-averaged branching fractions, and the charge asymmetry ${\cal A}_{ADS}$ of the ADS decays: ${\cal A}_{CP+}= 0.09\pm0.13 \pm 0.06$, ${\cal A}_{CP-}=-0.23\pm 0.21\pm 0.07$, ${\cal R}_{CP+} =2.17 \pm 0.35 \pm 0.09$,${\cal R}_{CP-} =1.03\pm 0.27\pm 0.13$, ${\cal R}_{ADS}=0.066\pm0.031\pm0.010$, and ${\cal A}_{ADS}=-0.34\pm0.43\pm 0.16$, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic. Combining all the measurements and using a frequentist approach yields the magnitude of the ratio between the Cabibbo-suppressed and favored amplitudes, $r_B$ = 0.31 with a one (two) sigma confidence level interval of [0.24, 0.38] ([0.17, 0.43]). The value $r_B=0$ is excluded at the 3.3 sigma level. A similar analysis excludes values of $γ$ in the intervals $[0, 7]^{\circ}, [55, 111]^{\circ}$, and $[175, 180]^{\circ}$ ([85, 99]$^{\circ}$) at the one (two) sigma confidence level.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.