Paper detail

Measurement and theory of gravitational coupling between resonating beams

Recent spectacular results of gravitational waves obtained by the LIGO system, with frequencies in the 100 Hz regime, make corresponding laboratory experiments with full control over cause and effect of great importance. Dynamic measurements of gravitation in the laboratory have to date been scarce, due to difficulties in assessing non-gravitational crosstalk and the intrinsically weak nature of gravitational forces. In fact, fully controlled quantitative experiments have so far been limited to frequencies in the mHz regime. New experiments in gravity might also yield new physics, thereby opening avenues towards a theory that explains all of physics within one coherent framework. Here we introduce a new, fully-characterized experiment at three orders of magnitude higher frequencies. It allows experimenters to quantitatively determine the dynamic gravitational interaction between two parallel beams vibrating at 42 Hz in bending motion. The large amplitude vibration of the transmitter beam produces gravitationally-induced motion with amplitudes up to 1E-11 m of the resonant detector beam. The reliable measurement with sub-pm displacement resolution is made possible by a set-up which combines acoustical, mechanical and electrical isolation, a temperature-stable environment, heterodyne laser interferometry and lock-in detection. The interaction is quantitatively modelled based on Newton's theory. Our initial results agree with the theory to within about three percent in amplitude. Based on a power balance analysis, we determined the near-field gravitational energy flow from the transmitter to the detector to be 2.5 E-20 J/s, and to decay with distance as d-4. We expect our experiment to make significant progress in directions where current experimental evidence for dynamic gravitation is limited, such as the dynamic determination of G, inverse-square law, and gravitational shielding.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.