Paper detail

Measured and Modeled Outdoor Indoor Coverage at 28 GHz into High Thermal Efficiency Buildings

28 GHz outdoor-indoor coverage into modern office buildings with high thermal efficiency windows is found to be severely limited due to 46 dB median penetration loss at normal incidence and additional 15 dB median oblique incidence loss. The study is based on measurements of path gain over 280 outdoor-indoor links, at ranges up to 100 m. A simple theoretical path gain model is extended to include building penetration through multiple sides of the building as well as a reflection from another building. The theoretical model accounts for the building orientation relative to the source, resulting in 4.9 dB RMSE relative to data, as compared to 5.7 dB RMSE from a linear fit and 14.7 dB RMSE for the 3GPP recommended model. Only coarse description of the buildings is required: building orientation and exterior wall composition, without any interior details. Coverage range for SNR>-8 dB from an outdoor base to a terminal just inside a high-efficiency building is under 35 m

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.