Paper detail

Mean plane of the Kuiper belt beyond 50 AU in the presence of Planet 9

Context. A recent observational census of Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) has unveiled anomalous orbital structures. This has led to the hypothesis that an additional $\sim5-10~m_{\oplus}$ planet exists. This planet, known as Planet 9, occupies an eccentric and inclined orbit at hundreds of astronomical units. However, the KBOs under consideration have the largest known semimajor axes at $a>250$ AU; thus they are very difficult to detect.// Aims. In the context of the proposed Planet 9, we aim to measure the mean plane of the Kuiper belt at $a>50$ AU. In a comparison of the expected and observed mean planes, some constraints would be put on the mass and orbit of this undiscovered planet. Methods. We adopted and developed the theoretical approach of Volk & Malhotra (2017) to the relative angle $δ$ between the expected mean plane of the Kuiper belt and the invariable plane determined by the eight known planets. Numerical simulations were constructed to validate our theoretical approach. Then similar to Volk & Malhotra (2017), we derived the angle $δ$ for the real observed KBOs with $100<a<200$ AU, and the measurement uncertainties were also estimated. Finally, for comparison, maps of the theoretically expected $δ$ were created for different combinations of possible Planet 9 parameters. Results. The expected mean plane of the Kuiper belt nearly coincides with the said invariable plane interior to $a=90$ AU. But these two planes deviate noticeably from each other at $a>100$ AU owing to the presence of Planet 9 because the relative angle $δ$ could be as large as $\sim10^{\circ}$. Using the $1σ$ upper limit of $δ<5^{\circ}$ deduced from real KBO samples as a constraint, we present the most probable parameters of Planet 9.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.