Paper detail

Mean Field Stochastic Adaptive Control

For noncooperative games the mean field (MF) methodology provides decentralized strategies which yield Nash equilibria for large population systems in the asymptotic limit of an infinite (mass) population. The MF control laws use only the local information of each agent on its own state and own dynamical parameters, while the mass effect is calculated offline using the distribution function of (i) the population's dynamical parameters, and (ii) the population's cost function parameters, for the infinite population case. These laws yield approximate equilibria when applied in the finite population. In this paper, these a priori information conditions are relaxed, and incrementally the cases are considered where, first, the agents estimate their own dynamical parameters, and, second, estimate the distribution parameter in (i) and (ii) above. An MF stochastic adaptive control (SAC) law in which each agent observes a random subset of the population of agents is specified, where the ratio of the cardinality of the observed set to that of the number of agents decays to zero as the population size tends to infinity. Each agent estimates its own dynamical parameters via the recursive weighted least squares (RWLS) algorithm and the distribution of the population's dynamical parameters via maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Under reasonable conditions on the population dynamical parameter distribution, the MF-SAC Law applied by each agent results in (i) the strong consistency of the self parameter estimates and the strong consistency of the population distribution function parameters; (ii) the long run average stability of all agent systems; (iii) a (strong) e-Nash equilibrium for the population of agents; and (iv) the a.s. equality of the long run average cost and the non-adaptive cost in the population limit.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.