Paper detail

Mean Field Limits of the Gross-Pitaevskii and Parabolic Ginzburg-Landau Equations

We prove that in a certain asymptotic regime, solutions of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation converge to solutions of the incompressible Euler equation, and solutions to the parabolic Ginzburg-Landau equations converge to solutions of a limiting equation which we identify. We work in the setting of the whole plane (and possibly the whole three-dimensional space in the Gross-Pitaevskii case), in the asymptotic limit where $ε$, the characteristic lengthscale of the vortices, tends to $0$, and in a situation where the number of vortices $N$ blows up as $ε\to 0$. The requirements are that $N$ should blow up faster than $|\log ε|$ in the Gross-Pitaevskii case, and at most like $|\log ε|$ in the parabolic case. Both results assume a well-prepared initial condition and regularity of the limiting initial data, and use the regularity of the solution to the limiting equation. In the case of the parabolic Ginzburg-Landau equation, the limiting mean-field dynamical law that we identify coincides with the one proposed by Chapman-Rubinstein-Schatzman and E in the regime $N\ll |\log ε|$, but not if $N$ grows faster.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.