Paper detail

Mean Field Description of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect Near $ν=1/(2k+1)$

The nature of Mean Field Solutions to the Equations of Motion of the Chern--Simons Landau--Ginsberg (CSLG) description of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE) is studied. Beginning with the conventional description of this model at some chemical potential $μ_0$ and magnetic field $B$ corresponding to a ``special'' filling fraction $ν=2πρ/eB=1/n$ ($n=1,3,5\cdot \cdot\cdot$) we show that a deviation of $μ$ in a finite range around $μ_0$ does not change the Mean Field solution and thus the mean density of particles in the model. This result holds not only for the lowest energy Mean Field solution but for the vortex excitations as well. The vortex configurations do not depend on $μ$ in a finite range about $μ_0$ in this model. However when $μ-μ_0 < μ_{cr}^-$ (or $μ-μ_0>μ_{cr}^+$) the lowest energy Mean Field solution describes a condensate of vortices (or antivortices). We give numerical examples of vortex and antivortex configurations and discuss the range of $μ$ and $ν$ over which the system of vortices is dilute.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.