Paper detail

Mean field approximations via log-concavity

We propose a new approach to deriving quantitative mean field approximations for any probability measure $P$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with density proportional to $e^{f(x)}$, for $f$ strongly concave. We bound the mean field approximation for the log partition function $\log \int e^{f(x)}dx$ in terms of $\sum_{i \neq j}\mathbb{E}_{Q^*}|\partial_{ij}f|^2$, for a semi-explicit probability measure $Q^*$ characterized as the unique mean field optimizer, or equivalently as the minimizer of the relative entropy $H(\cdot\,|\,P)$ over product measures. This notably does not involve metric-entropy or gradient-complexity concepts which are common in prior work on nonlinear large deviations. Three implications are discussed, in the contexts of continuous Gibbs measures on large graphs, high-dimensional Bayesian linear regression, and the construction of decentralized near-optimizers in high-dimensional stochastic control problems. Our arguments are based primarily on functional inequalities and the notion of displacement convexity from optimal transport.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.