Paper detail

McKay correspondence

This is a rough write-up of my lecture at Kinosaki and two lectures at RIMS workshops in Dec 1996, on work in progress that has not yet reached any really worthwhile conclusion, but contains lots of fun calculations. History of Vafa&#39;s formula, how the McKay correspondence for finite subgroups of SL(n,C) relates to mirror symmetry. The main aim is to give numerical examples of how the 2 McKay correspondences (1) representations of G <--> cohomology of resolution (2) conjugacy classes of G <--> homology must work, and to restate my 1992 Conjecture as a tautology, like cohomology or K-theory of projective space. Another aim is to give an introduction to Nakamura&#39;s results on the Hilbert scheme of G-clusters, following his preprints and his many helpful explanations. This is partly based on joint work with Y. Ito, and has benefited from encouragement and invaluable suggestions of S. Mukai.

preprint1997arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.