Paper detail

Maximum $k$-Biplex Search on Bipartite Graphs: A Symmetric-BK Branching Approach

Enumerating maximal $k$-biplexes (MBPs) of a bipartite graph has been used for applications such as fraud detection. Nevertheless, there usually exists an exponential number of MBPs, which brings up two issues when enumerating MBPs, namely the effectiveness issue (many MBPs are of low values) and the efficiency issue (enumerating all MBPs is not affordable on large graphs). Existing proposals of tackling this problem impose constraints on the number of vertices of each MBP to be enumerated, yet they are still not sufficient (e.g., they require to specify the constraints, which is often not user-friendly, and cannot control the number of MBPs to be enumerated directly). Therefore, in this paper, we study the problem of finding $K$ MBPs with the most edges called MaxBPs, where $K$ is a positive integral user parameter. The new proposal well avoids the drawbacks of existing proposals. We formally prove the NP-hardness of the problem. We then design two branch-and-bound algorithms, among which, the better one called FastBB improves the worst-case time complexity to $O^*(γ_k^ n)$, where $O^*$ suppresses the polynomials, $γ_k$ is a real number that relies on $k$ and is strictly smaller than 2, and $n$ is the number of vertices in the graph. For example, for $k=1$, $γ_k$ is equal to $1.754$. We further introduce three techniques for boosting the performance of the branch-and-bound algorithms, among which, the best one called PBIE can further improve the time complexity to $O^*(γ_k^{d^3})$ for large sparse graphs, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the graph. We conduct extensive experiments on both real and synthetic datasets, and the results show that our algorithm is up to four orders of magnitude faster than all baselines and finding MaxBPs works better than finding all MBPs for a fraud detection application.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.