Paper detail

Maximizing Utility Among Selfish Users in Social Groups

We consider the problem of a social group of users trying to obtain a "universe" of files, first from a server and then via exchange amongst themselves. We consider the selfish file-exchange paradigm of give-and-take, whereby two users can exchange files only if each has something unique to offer the other. We are interested in maximizing the number of users who can obtain the universe through a schedule of file-exchanges. We first present a practical paradigm of file acquisition. We then present an algorithm which ensures that at least half the users obtain the universe with high probability for $n$ files and $m=O(\log n)$ users when $n\rightarrow\infty$, thereby showing an approximation ratio of 2. Extending these ideas, we show a $1+ε_1$ - approximation algorithm for $m=O(n)$, $ε_1>0$ and a $(1+z)/2 +ε_2$ - approximation algorithm for $m=O(n^z)$, $z>1$, $ε_2>0$. Finally, we show that for any $m=O(e^{o(n)})$, there exists a schedule of file exchanges which ensures that at least half the users obtain the universe.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.