Paper detail

Maximizing Expected Utility for Stochastic Combinatorial Optimization Problems

We study the stochastic versions of a broad class of combinatorial problems where the weights of the elements in the input dataset are uncertain. The class of problems that we study includes shortest paths, minimum weight spanning trees, and minimum weight matchings, and other combinatorial problems like knapsack. We observe that the expected value is inadequate in capturing different types of {\em risk-averse} or {\em risk-prone} behaviors, and instead we consider a more general objective which is to maximize the {\em expected utility} of the solution for some given utility function, rather than the expected weight (expected weight becomes a special case). Under the assumption that there is a pseudopolynomial time algorithm for the {\em exact} version of the problem (This is true for the problems mentioned above), we can obtain the following approximation results for several important classes of utility functions: (1) If the utility function $\uti$ is continuous, upper-bounded by a constant and $\lim_{x\rightarrow+\infty}\uti(x)=0$, we show that we can obtain a polynomial time approximation algorithm with an {\em additive error} $ε$ for any constant $ε>0$. (2) If the utility function $\uti$ is a concave increasing function, we can obtain a polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS). (3) If the utility function $\uti$ is increasing and has a bounded derivative, we can obtain a polynomial time approximation scheme. Our results recover or generalize several prior results on stochastic shortest path, stochastic spanning tree, and stochastic knapsack. Our algorithm for utility maximization makes use of the separability of exponential utility and a technique to decompose a general utility function into exponential utility functions, which may be useful in other stochastic optimization problems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.