Paper detail

Maximizing Convergence Time in Network Averaging Dynamics Subject to Edge Removal

We consider the consensus interdiction problem (CIP), in which the goal is to maximize the convergence time of consensus averaging dynamics subject to removing a limited number of network edges. We first show that CIP can be cast as an effective resistance interdiction problem (ERIP), in which the goal is to remove a limited number of network edges to maximize the effective resistance between a source node and a sink node. We show that ERIP is strongly NP-hard, even for bipartite graphs of diameter three with fixed source/sink edges, and establish the same hardness result for the CIP. We then show that both ERIP and CIP cannot be approximated up to a (nearly) polynomial factor assuming exponential time hypothesis. Subsequently, we devise a polynomial-time $mn$-approximation algorithm for the ERIP that only depends on the number of nodes $n$ and the number of edges $m$, but is independent of the size of edge resistances. Finally, using a quadratic program formulation for the CIP, we devise an iterative approximation algorithm to find a first-order stationary solution for the CIP and evaluate its good performance through numerical results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.