Paper detail

Maximal equivariant compactification of the Urysohn spaces and other metric structures

We study isometric $G$-spaces and the question of when their maximal equivariant compactification is the Gromov compactification (meaning that it coincides with the compactification generated by the distance functions to points). Answering questions of Pestov, we show that this is the case for the Urysohn sphere and related spaces, but not for the unit sphere of the Gurarij space. We show that the maximal equivariant compactification of a separably categorical metric structure $M$ under the action of its automorphism group can be identified with the space $S_1(M)$ of 1-types over $M$, and is in particular metrizable. This provides a unified understanding of the previous and other examples. In particular, the maximal equivariant compactifications of the spheres of the Gurarij space and of the $L^p$ spaces are metrizable. We also prove a uniform version of Effros' Theorem for isometric actions of Roelcke precompact Polish groups.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.