Paper detail

Maximal entanglement concentration for $(n+1)$-qubit states

We propose two schemes for concentration of $(n+1)$-qubit entangled states that can be written in the form of $(α|φ_{0}\rangle|0\rangle+β|φ_{1}\rangle|1\rangle)_{n+1}$ where $|φ_{0}\rangle$ and $|φ_{1}\rangle$ are mutually orthogonal $n$-qubit states. The importance of this general form is that the entangled states like Bell, cat, GHZ, GHZ-like, $|Ω\rangle$, $|Q_{5}\rangle$, 4-qubit cluster states and specific states from the 9 SLOCC-nonequivalent families of 4-qubit entangled states can be expressed in this form. The proposed entanglement concentration protocol is based on the local operations and classical communications (LOCC). It is shown that the maximum success probability for ECP using quantum nondemolition (QND) technique is $2β^{2}$ for $(n+1)$-qubit states of the prescribed form. It is shown that the proposed schemes can be implemented optically. Further it is also noted that the proposed schemes can be implemented using quantum dot and microcavity systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.