Paper detail

MAXI~J1348--630: Estimating the black hole mass and binary inclination using a scaling technique

The outburst activity in the MAXI~J1348--630 has sparked a great deal of controversy, whether the source contains a black hole (BH). Here, we present the results of our analysis of the outburst of MAXI J348--630 using Swift/XRT data. We find that energy spectra in all spectral states can be modeled using a combination of Comptonization and Gaussian iron-line components. In addition, we show that the X-ray photon index, Gamma, is correlated with the mass accretion rate, Mdot. We find that Gamma increases monotonically with Mdot from the LHS to the HSS, and then saturated at Gamma~3. This index behavior is similar to that exhibited by a number of other BH candidates. This result represents observational evidence of the presence of a BH in MAXI~J1348--630. We also show that the value of Gamma is correlated with the QPO frequency, ν_{L}. Based on this correlation, we applied a scaling method to estimate a BH mass of 14.8 +/- 0.9 M_{\odot}, using the BH binary XTE~J1550--564 as a reference source. The recent discovery of a giant dust scattering ring around MAXI~J1348--630 by SRG/eROSITA has refined distance estimates to this X-ray source. With this distance, we were able to estimate the disk inclination i = (65+/- 7)^0 using the scaling technique for the correlation between Gamma and normalization proportional to Mdot. An initial decrease in kT_s occurred simultaneously with an increase in the illumination fraction, f. At the start of the outburst, the Compton cloud (or "corona") is very extended and, thus, the seed photons injected to the corona from the relatively far-away disk region, where kT_s is about 0.2--0.4 keV. While Mdot increases (or luminosity increases), the corona contracts, thus increasing the seed photon temperature, kT_s.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.