Paper detail

Max-Flow Min-Cut Theorems for Multi-User Communication Networks

The paper presents four distinct new ideas and results for communication networks: 1) We show that relay-networks (i.e. communication networks where different nodes use the same coding functions) can be used to model dynamic networks. 2) We introduce {\em the term model}, which is a simple, graph-free symbolic approach to communication networks. 3) We state and prove variants of a theorem concerning the dispersion of information in single-receiver communications. 4) We show that the solvability of an abstract multi-user communication problem is equivalent to the solvability of a single-target communication in a suitable relay network. In the paper, we develop a number of technical ramifications of these ideas and results. One technical result is a max-flow min-cut theorem for the Rényi entropy with order less than one, given that the sources are equiprobably distributed; conversely, we show that the max-flow min-cut theorem fails for the Rényi entropy with order greater than one. We leave the status of the theorem with regards to the ordinary Shannon Entropy measure (Rényi entropy of order one and the limit case between validity or failure of the theorem) as an open question. In non-dynamic static communication networks with a single receiver, a simple application of Menger's theorem shows that the optimal throughput can be achieved without proper use of network coding i.e. just by using ordinary packet-switching. This fails dramatically in relay networks with a single receiver. We show that even a powerful method like linear network coding fails miserably for relay networks. With that in mind, it is noticeable that our rather weak form of network coding (routing with dynamic headers) is asymptotically sufficient to reach capacity.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.