Paper detail

Max-Consensus Over Fading Wireless Channels

The topic of this paper is achieving finite-time max-consensus in a multi-agent system that communicates over a fading wireless channel and exploits its interference property. This phenomenon corrupts the desired information when data is transmitted synchronously. In fact, each transmitted signal is attenuated by an unknown and time-varying factor (fading coefficient), then, by interference, all such attenuated signals are summed up at a receiver. Rather than combatting interference, we design a communication system that exploits it. Our strategy yields a more efficient usage of wireless resources compared to other algorithms. By simultaneously accessing this communication system, each agent obtains a weighted average of the neighbouring agents' information states. With this piece of information at hand and with a switching consensus protocol employing broadcast authorisations for agents, max-consensus can be achieved within a finite number of iterations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.