Paper detail

Matroid Secretary Problem in the Random Assignment Model

In the Matroid Secretary Problem, introduced by Babaioff et al. [SODA 2007], the elements of a given matroid are presented to an online algorithm in random order. When an element is revealed, the algorithm learns its weight and decides whether or not to select it under the restriction that the selected elements form an independent set in the matroid. The objective is to maximize the total weight of the chosen elements. In the most studied version of this problem, the algorithm has no information about the weights beforehand. We refer to this as the zero information model. In this paper we study a different model, also proposed by Babaioff et al., in which the relative order of the weights is random in the matroid. To be precise, in the random assignment model, an adversary selects a collection of weights that are randomly assigned to the elements of the matroid. Later, the elements are revealed to the algorithm in a random order independent of the assignment. Our main result is the first constant competitive algorithm for the matroid secretary problem in the random assignment model. This solves an open question of Babaioff et al. Our algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $2e^2/(e-1)$. It exploits the notion of principal partition of a matroid, its decomposition into uniformly dense minors, and a $2e$-competitive algorithm for uniformly dense matroids we also develop. As additional results, we present simple constant competitive algorithms in the zero information model for various classes of matroids including cographic, low density and the case when every element is in a small cocircuit. In the same model, we also give a $ke$-competitive algorithm for $k$-column sparse linear matroids, and a new $O(\log r)$-competitive algorithm for general matroids of rank $r$ which only uses the relative order of the weights seen and not their numerical value, as previously needed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.