Paper detail

Matrices that are self-congruent only via matrices of determinant one

Docovic and Szechtman, [Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133 (2005) 2853-2863] considered a vector space V endowed with a bilinear form. They proved that all isometries of V over a field F of characteristic not 2 have determinant 1 if and only if V has no orthogonal summands of odd dimension (the case of characteristic 2 was also considered). Their proof is based on Riehm's classification of bilinear forms. Coakley, Dopico, and Johnson [Linear Algebra Appl. 428 (2008) 796-813] gave another proof of this criterion over the fields of real and complex numbers using Thompson's canonical pairs of symmetric and skew-symmetric matrices for congruence. Let M be the matrix of the bilinear form on V. We give another proof of this criterion over F using our canonical matrices for congruence and obtain necessary and sufficient conditions involving canonical forms of M for congruence, of (M^T,M) for equivalence, and of M^{-T}M (if M is nonsingular) for similarity.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.