Paper detail

Mating of trees for critical Liouville quantum gravity

In a groundbreaking work, Duplantier, Miller and Sheffield showed that subcritical Liouville quantum gravity (LQG) coupled with Schramm-Loewner evolutions (SLE) can be described by the mating of two continuum random trees. In this paper, we consider the counterpart of their result for critical LQG and SLE, i.e., for the case when $γ^2=κ=16/κ=4$. We prove that as one sends $κ\downarrow 4$ in the subcritical setting, the space-filling SLE$_κ$ in a disk degenerates to the CLE$_4$ exploration introduced by Werner and Wu, along with a collection of i.i.d.\ coin tosses indexed by the branch points of the exploration. Furthermore, in the $κ=16/γ^2\downarrow 4$ limit, the pair of continuum random trees collapse into a single continuum random tree, and we observe that upon applying an appropriate affine transform to the encoding Brownian motions before taking the limit, we get convergence to a pair of independent Brownian motions $(A,B)$. The Brownian motion $A$ encodes the LQG distance from the CLE loops to the boundary of the disk, while the Brownian motion $B$ encodes the boundary lengths of the CLE$_4$ loops. In contrast to the subcritical setting, $(A,B)$ does not determine the CLE-decorated LQG surface.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.