Paper detail

Mathematical analysis of the acoustic imaging modality using bubbles as contrast agents at nearly resonating frequencies

We analyze mathematically the acoustic imaging modality using bubbles as contrast agents. These bubbles are modeled by mass densities and bulk moduli enjoying contrasting scales. These contrasting scales allow them to resonate at certain incident frequencies. We consider two types of such contrasts. In the first one, the bubbles are light with small bulk modulus, as compared to the ones of the background, so that they generate the Minnaert resonance (corresponding to a local surface wave). In the second one, the bubbles have moderate mass density but still with small bulk modulus so that they generate a sequence of resonances (corresponding to local body waves). We propose to use as measurements the far-fields collected before and after injecting a bubble, set at a given location point in the target domain, generated at a band of incident frequencies and at a fixed single backscattering direction. Then, we scan the target domain with such bubbles and collect the corresponding far-fields. The goal is to reconstruct both the, variable, mass density and bulk modulus of the background in the target region. 1. We show that, for each fixed used bubble, the contrasted far-fields reach their maximum value at, incident, frequencies close to the Minneart resonance (or the body-wave resonances depending on the types of bubbles we use). Hence, we can reconstruct this resonance from our data. The explicit dependence of the Minnaert resonance in terms of the background mass density of the background allows us to recover it, i.e. the mass density, in a straightforward way. 2. In addition, this measured contrasted far-fields allow us to recover the total field at the location points of the bubbles (i.e. the total field in the absence of the bubbles). A numerical differentiation argument, for instance, allows us to recover the bulk modulus of the targeted region as well.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.