Paper detail

Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation of the Guyer-Krumhansl heat equation

The Guyer-Krumhansl heat equation has numerous important practical applications in both low-temperature and room temperature heat conduction problems. In recent years, it turned out that the Guyer-Krumhansl model can effectively describe the thermal behaviour of macroscale heterogeneous materials. Thus, the Guyer-Krumhansl equation is a promising candidate to be the next standard model in engineering. However, to support the Guyer-Krumhansl equation's introduction into the engineering practice, its mathematical properties must be thoroughly investigated and understood. In the present paper, we show the basic structure of this particular heat equation, focusing on the differences in comparison to the Fourier heat equation {obtained when $(τ_{q}, μ^{2})\rightarrow (0,0)$}. Additionally, we prove the well-posedness of a particular, practically significant initial and boundary value problem. The stability of the solution is also investigated in the discrete space using a finite difference approach.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.